The lack of updates recently is due to my being busy at work. Between training and work, just about ever minute of my day is allocated to something. A few exciting things have happened in the past 6 weeks, which will trickle on here as I find time.
A VeloNews article about Matthew Busche caught my attention this morning. At 24 years old and with a lighting fast upgrade from Cat 2, VeloNews heralds Mr. Busche as a rising star with unlimited potential. That's wonderful, honestly, and I wish him all the best. This just makes me wonder about my own potential as a cyclist. At a high level, physical prowess is a limiter, but not the only one. Professional and personal life, time, money, and support become factors more quickly than I would like. Is being a professional cyclist, at anything but the very highest level of the sport, worth the pay cut, time away from an SO, and risk of injury or stagnation in a career? I'm not getting soft now, but simply applying a typical cost/benefit analysis.
I wonder: who was the last MIT cycling alum to become a domestic-level or higher pro? A cursory search found nothing, so I need to investigate further.